Thursday, October 22, 2020

My First Podcast Audiogram (and it's about werewolves!)

 Anyone who produces a podcast has (whether they admit it or not) something I call "audiogram envy" - a longing for those cool little video teasers that include a responsive sound wave graphic.

Well... I envy no longer, and that's because my very own first podcast audiogram was just released.

To celebrate the scary season, I'm in the midst of a five-part series of episodes celebrating Halloween. This week on Stephanie Hoover Has That Story, I talk about the origins of the werewolf mythology and the legends of lycanthropy.

Want a sneak peak...? Check out my one-minute audiogram teaser. And if you like the preview, be sure to watch the whole show here.



Monday, September 14, 2020

The 1969 Vietnam Draft Lottery: 90 Minutes that Changed Half a Million Lives

Listen to the Podcast:



Read the Article:

Being born on September 14th isn't of much consequence in today's world. It's just one of the random 365 possible dates of birth in any given year. But… in 1969, this accident of birth was - depending on one's point of view - lucky, worrisome or downright horrifying.

On December 1, 1969, you see, the United States Selective Service System held its first draft lottery for Vietnam. Or, as Richard Nixon called it,  "random selection." As millions of Americans watched on television, the first capsule was drawn from a glass jar. The date inside that capsule: September 14th.


A second lottery was held that same night, but rather than birth dates this one determined surnames. The first letter drawn was "J."


Hundreds of thousands of young American men breathed a sigh of relief. But not Scott Jenkins, born September 14, 1949. For him the drawing was like someone tapping him on the shoulder and saying, "Welcome to the Army, son. You're going to Vietnam."


In America, the draft (or conscription) was first used during the Revolutionary War. It was reinstituted during the Civil War, both World Wars, Korea and, of course, Vietnam. In a nutshell, the purpose of the draft is to correct the deficit left when there are more vacancies in the Armed Services than there are volunteers. The draft has always been a source of conflict, though, particularly during the Civil War when the practice of "substitution" was allowed. Unfortunately, it was an option often exercised by the well-to-do, and the simmering resentment of the practice led to rioting.


In 1968, Richard Milhouse Nixon ran for president on the slogan, "peace with honor." He promised to end the unpopular Vietnam war. Although President Lyndon B. Johnson dropped out of race, in the months leading up to the election he had been working to negotiate a truce. To this day, there is speculation that Nixon covertly interfered and encouraged the North Vietnamese to pull out of the talks so that he, if elected, could end the war.


By the time of Nixon's election, many were suspicious of the Selective Service System. As during the Civil War, it seemed that young men from upper class families were less likely to be drafted. Nixon sought to rectify this injustice by bringing back the "lottery" system of the draft last used in World War II. Its random nature would ensure, Nixon promised, that all young men were equally eligible for conscription. The first such draft lottery was scheduled for December 1, 1969. It was, for families that included young men between the ages of 19 and 26, like some terrifying reality TV show.


The draft "ceremony" started at 8 p.m. and was expected to end at 10. Members of the Selective Service Youth Advisory Board were brought to Washington DC for the event, and it was only when they were paraded before the cameras in groups of eight that they learned their real roles: they would draw the plastic capsules containing the birth dates.


There were 366 capsules in total (the extra to accommodate leap year). They were placed in a glass jar, two feet high and 16" inches in diameter. Hanging behind the table holding the glass jar was a large board displaying the numbers 1 through 366.


At 8 p.m., with very little fanfare, New York Congressman Alexander Pirnie pulled the first capsule. It contained the birth date September 14. That slip of paper was then affixed to the board, beside position number 1. The odds that young men born on this day between the years 1944 and 1950 would - without some form of deferment - be shipped to Vietnam were 100%.


The United States expected a volunteer enrollment of 290,000 for 1970 which left a deficit of nearly 260,000 required military personnel. This meant that, at the very least, men with the first 122 birth dates pulled would be drafted.


Men with the last 122 birth dates picked would likely never see military service.


Those with the 122 birth dates chosen midway through the draft would suffer the chronic uncertainty of never knowing if or when their numbers would be called.


Several of the Selective Service Youth Advisory Board members were angry about their surprise roles in the draft. One, John R. Lyne, flashed a peace sign before reaching into the jar. Another walked up to the capsules, but then turned away - refusing to participate in the lottery.


Families watching at home felt mixed emotions. Some were happy that their sons would join the military. Others were angry and frightened to see their son's birth date listed among the first on the board. Still others felt enormous relief - mixed with the guilt of knowing that another family would soon be saying goodbye to its son, or cousin, or brother.


As it turned out, the drawing ended well before 10 p.m. In the end it took less than 90 minutes to change the lives of nearly half a million young men.


For most Americans, the draft only served to fuel more vehement opposition to the Vietnam war. Still, the fighting continued and during some months as many as 40,000 men were conscripted.


By June of 1972, Nixon was promising that he would end the draft. It was one of the biggest reasons he was re-elected, just five months later.


Shortly after the start of his second term, the Paris Peace Accords resulted in an official cease fire that allowed for the removal of remaining American troops.


Two years later, to no one's surprise, communist North Vietnam successfully conquered South Vietnam creating the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.


In the minds of most, 58,318 American lives had been lost for absolutely nothing.


In all, 2,709,918 U.S. military personnel served in the Vietnam conflict. Though exact figures are nearly impossible to ascertain, estimates of total deaths - including allies and enemy combatants - stands at anywhere from 1.3 to 4.2 million.


If you think that the draft is just a relic of history, think again. All young American men, within 30 days of their 18th birthday, must register with the Selective Service System. If authorized by Congress and the President, that glass jar might yet again be hauled out of its storage closet and filled with plastic capsules.


What do you think YOUR number might be…? SH

----------------------------------


For more information on Stephanie's podcast, books and personal appearances, visit this page of her website.

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Thanks for the Pod Love

Yesterday I released the 14th episode of my podcast, Stephanie Hoover Has That Story. Each week brings more and more listeners, and I could not be more thrilled or appreciative. 

The decision to create my own podcast was months in the making. Friends, family members and fans who turned out at my personal appearances all urged me to take the leap. But "putting yourself out there" for a two-hour talk is a little different from doing it with a digital audio file that will live on the internet forever. As you can see, though, those fears didn't stop me.

So... here I am, 14 weeks in, and - to be honest - loving every minute of it. And all of you who listen to the podcast each week are the real reason for the success of the show.

If I could, I would visit each one of you to thank you personally. Since that's impossible - and a little "stalker-ish" - you'll have to settle for a blog post group thank you. Trust me, my appreciation couldn't be more heartfelt either way.

Sappy thoughts aside... if you've caught the political fever from this month's two major party conventions, perhaps you're also interested in U.S. political history. It is with that mindset that I produced my episode on the 1934 Kelayres Massacre, one of the bloodiest political chapters in American history. Five men were killed, and 26 men, women and children were injured. Why? Because a nepotistic Republican party boss in a small Pennsylvania mining town realized he was losing power - and he took his frustration out on a group of unarmed Democrat parade marchers.

There are two shocking truths about this case: the first is that very few people knew about this incident before I wrote the book, The Kelayres Massacre: Politics and Murder in Pennsylvania's Anthracite Coal County; and the second is that the political climate of the 1930s is disturbingly similar to ours today. Hopefully, the more people that hear the story, the lesser the chance of such carnage ever happening again.

After you listen to the Kelayres Massacre episode, perhaps you'll listen to my other shows. Recent topics include Rose Mackenberg (Harry Houdini's "right hand woman"), the Pennsylvania Hex Murders and Six Things You Don't Know about the Kennedy Assassination. Visit StephanieHoover.com for all of the links and details.

In the meantime, here is the story of the Kelayres Massacre:

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Will Gatsby Still be "Great" When Its Copyright Expires?

The Great Gatsby is and, at least in my view, will likely remain the greatest American novel ever written. And so, I am terrified what will happen to it on January 1, 2021 when its copyright expires. 

I'm even less excited about this news: four days after that copyright expires, a book by Michael Farris Smith will release. It's called Nick and it's a prequel to the great, Great Gatsby.

I'm not sure if this is an supreme act of hubris, or if this author thinks he can actually capture Fitzgerald's essence. I'm already disappointed by the cover, which is simply a slightly altered knockoff of the original. Hopefully the writing will be more imaginative than the book's dust jacket. 

We'll find out in January.


Monday, June 29, 2020

Psychic Detectives: Usually Right - in Hindsight

In the 1970s, the CIA set out to learn just how useful psychics might be in criminal investigations. But, two bogus "psychic detectives" (Peter Hurkos and Greta Alexander) gave the whole field a black eye. 

Read my article on Clouded in Mystery.

Or, listen to my podcast episode here:

Monday, June 15, 2020

The Disappearance of Agatha Christie

In December 1926, the world had but one question: "Where is Agatha Christie?"

Learn the full story behind the beloved mystery writer's eleven-day disappearance in this 9-minute episode:

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

What Do Luminol and the Sam Sheppard Trial Have in Common? Glad You Asked.

Today, nearly every modern fan of fictional or true crime shows is familiar with Luminol's recognizable blue glow - but during the infamous murder trial of Dr. Sam Sheppard, it was new and sounded to the jury like something from a science fiction novel. 

In this episode of Stephanie Hoover Has That Story, I tell you about the history of Luminol, and its role in what was then called, "The Trial of the Century."


Thursday, June 4, 2020

Proudly Introducing My Podcast.. "Stephanie Hoover Has That Story"

I'm so proud to unveil the first episode of my podcast, "Stephanie Hoover Has That Story."

The slogan of the show is, "Whether it's history, crime or legend - Stephanie Hoover Has That Story."

Over the next weeks, I'll be covering a variety of entertaining and interesting stories. On this first episode, I'm talking about the 1920 locked room murder of carouser and card player Joseph Elwell which spawned the creation of fictional detective Philo Vance.

If you're looking for an interesting way to spend the next 13 minutes, give it a listen.


Friday, May 29, 2020

Proud to Be a Guest on the Popular "Most Notorious!" Podcast

There's a reason why Rolling Stone called Erik Rivenes's historical true crime podcast one of the "ten best." Erik actually reads the book and conducts thorough and entertaining interviews.



I now know this first hand. I was fortunate enough to be a guest on the May 24, 2020 episode. We discussed the Kelayres Massacre - a staggeringly bloody political conflict that happened in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania in 1934. To be able to share my book and knowledge of this incident was a great honor.

Please consider listening to the podcast. You can find it on MostNotorious.com, on Apple Podcasts, and other popular streaming platforms.

As always, let me know what you think.

Saturday, January 18, 2020

Pro Research Tip: Internet Archive Search String


If you're a historical non-fiction writer and researcher like me, or simply conducting historical or genealogical research for personal reasons, you've probably discovered Internet Archive (found at Archive.org). What you may NOT know is how to limit your search to a specific time period - such as materials that exist in the public domain. 
I've created a search string that does EXACTLY that and all you have to do is copy/paste it into the Internet Archive search bar (NOT the Wayback Machine bar). Simply replace the three asterisks (***) - leaving the quotation marks as is - with your one-word or multi-word search term. And remember, you can change the dates if a public domain search is not your goal.

COPY/PASTE THIS PUBLIC DOMAIN LIMITED SEARCH STRING:
description:("***") AND date:[1800-01-01 TO 1924-12-31]

Happy searching!

Subscribe to Author Stephanie Hoover Powered by FeedBurner


Thursday, January 9, 2020

"Fair Use": Four Factors You Need to Understand

"Fair Use" is one of the least understood, most litigated aspects of United States copyright law. In essence, it controls the use of other copyrighted works in your own art, writing, reviews or news reporting. The concept of Fair Use is judge-created and first surfaced in the 19th century. It was not until 1976 that Fair Use was codified by the U.S. Copyright Office.


To help both lawyers and the general public understand how previous cases were adjudicated, the Copyright Office offers a publicly accessible Fair Use Index. While it is in no way intended to replace qualified legal advice, the case summaries included in the index help researchers understand how and when judges have applied the "four-step analysis" to reach their decisions. These four deciding factors are:


  1. The purpose and character of the use of copyrighted work. The main question at issue here: does the new work change the function and meaning of the original by connoting a message that was previously non-existent? If so, it may well be Fair Use.
  2. The nature of the copyrighted work. Is the work you're borrowing from highly creative? Does it incorporate unique creative choices? If so, based on a review of decisions in the index, it appears more likely that Fair Use does not apply and that defendants will face a verdict of copyright infringement.
  3. Amount and substantiality of the portion used. This one is self-explanatory. The more of the creator's original work you use, the harder it may be to win a Fair Use argument.
  4. Future market harm. Does use of the original creation negatively impact its potential future sales and marketability? If so, it seems likely that the defendant's use will be deemed improper and damaging.


The succinct synopses of decided cases in the Fair Use Index typically run one page in length and can be downloaded as PDFs. They are not only interesting reading (plaintiffs include Dr. Seuss Enterprises and Fox News Network), these summaries also provide keen insight into the many ways defendants have run afoul of U.S. copyright laws.

Thursday, January 2, 2020

I Studied My 2019 Social Media Activity - Here's the Result


We all spend far too much time on social media - but what does it really do for us as writers? Well... when you can answer that question, let me know. What I do know (for the first time in all the years I've been using social media) is which 2019 posts actually spurred interaction.

Getting Personal

I was gobsmacked to learn that the largest percentage of reactions to my posts (a whopping 58%) resulted from the sharing of personal stories. Photos of myself (or me with family members), posts about childhood experiences, updates about my struggles and successes - those are the items that registered the most with my followers and by a long shot. These updates garnered 28% more responses than the next largest category of post.

I'm not, by nature, much of a self-marketer so it never crossed my mind that folks would want to know the "real Stephanie." Turns out I was wrong - and what a relief that is. Trying to be an "influencer" is way outside of my natural habitat. Glad to know I can just be me, and folks dig it.

Just Write - Don't Talk about It

A fairly substantial 30% of social media interactions came as a result of posts about writing or publishing. Good news because I really like sharing industry updates and thoughts about the writing process. Still, when you're a writer, most people who follow you already know it. Reminding the audience of this fact is both pompous and unnecessary. Most importantly, it's not information your general readership will slow their scroll for.

Save the Political Analysis

I try to be very, very sparse in my political posts because, quite frankly, it's a "no win" topic. And clearly, at 5% of my interactions, that's an accurate assessment on my part. In 2020, my goal is to politic even less.

It's Not News if No One Cares

Occasionally, I see a news story that I find fascinating. My assumption that others might share this enthusiasm is obviously misguided. At just a 4% interaction rate, my news stories fell on deaf ears in 2019. I'll probably still post stories about lost puppies and haunted grocery stories in 2020 - I just won't expect anyone to respond.

Ditch the Sales Pitch

The least surprising finding from my 2019 social media analysis is this one: save the sales pitch because 97% of your online community will ignore it. Which is okay, because promotion of my own books is my least posted kind of message. I'll certainly let followers know when a book is releasing, and I'll still post the occasional book giveaway. Other than that, I'll stick with the posts that share a little bit about who I am as a person. My statistics prove that's what my social media community really wants to read about.